assessments; (iv) refused to accept any of Yukos’ provides to fulfill the tax claims with other assets; and (v) refused to delay or forego the auction on the voting shares of YNG even though Yukos experienced (pending a resolution of its lawful difficulties) by the point on the auction pleased the entirety of its alleged year 2000 legal responsib

The Respondent’s arguments to the contrary depend on legal authorities from the sphere of diplomatic safety, not bilateral investment treaties. [ ] verified that Rosneft, since the successor in curiosity to YNG, had breached its obligation to repay specific mortgage agreements among YNG and the offshore Yukos entity. The Russian courts experience